Abstract
ABSTRACT This article considers the case of the NM Cherry Blossom, a bulk carrier that docked in South Africa loaded with phosphate cargo from Western Sahara. The Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic argued that the phosphate cargo was pillaged from the non-self-governing territory, and a South African court set out to determine ownership. This article analyses South Africa’s recognition of the Sahrawi state’s sovereignty as it pertains to determining the ownership of the phosphate in question. This recognition subsequently creates legal and political possibilities based on sovereignty that is not mediated through or reliant upon the United Nations. I argue that we must attend to jurisdictional histories and contexts in order to consider the scope of new political possibilities for decolonisation struggles.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
