Abstract
During the Renaissance, representations of the Nordic northernmost territories were still largely based on ancient geographical classifications, especially on the theory of the five terrestrial zones. It postulated that three of them, the torrid zone and the northern and southern frigid zones, were uninhabitable for humans. While the habitability of the torrid zone was confirmed as early as the mid-15th century, the one of the poles remained uncertain for a long time. As the refutation of the ancient opinion on the torrid zone becomes commonplace in the texts that rely on modern experience, the verdict on the habitability of the poles is less clear. This article analyses the views of three 16th-century authors – Olaus Magnus, Andre Thevet and Jean Bodin – on this question and their considerations about the settlement of the Far North in comparison with that of the torrid zone.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.