Terms of reference

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) launched a series of country evaluations, called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs), in order to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. Undertaken in selected countries, the ADRs focus on outcomes and critically examine achievements and constraints in the UNDP thematic areas of focus, draw lessons learned, and provide recommendations for the future. The ADRs also provide strategic analysis for enhancing performance and strategically positioning UNDP support within national development priorities and UNDP corporate policy directions.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has launched a series of country evaluations, called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs), in order to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. Undertaken in selected countries, the ADRs focus on outcomes and critically examine achievements and constraints in the UNDP thematic areas of focus, draw lessons learned, and provide recommendations for the future. The ADRs also provide strategic analysis for enhancing performance and strategically positioning UNDP support within national development priorities and UNDP corporate policy directions.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) regularly conducts a number of country evaluations called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs) in order to capture and demonstrate the evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. Undertaken in selected countries, the ADRs focus on outcomes and critically examine achievements and constraints in the UNDP thematic areas of focus, draw lessons learned, and provide recommendations for the future. The ADRs also provide strategic analysis for enhancing performance and strategically positioning UNDP support within national development priorities and UNDP corporate policy directions.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) launched a series of country evaluations, called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs), in order to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. Undertaken in selected countries, the ADRs focus on outcomes and critically examine achievements and constraints in the UNDP thematic areas of focus, drawing lessons learned and providing re commendations for the future. The ADRs will also recommend a strategy for enhancing performance and strategically positioning UNDP support within national development priorities and UNDP corporate policy directions.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) carries out a series of country evaluations, called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs), in order capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. Undertaken in selected countries every year, the ADRs focus on outcomes and critically examine achievements and constraints in the UNDP thematic areas of focus, draw lessons learnt and provide recommendations for the future. The ADRs also recommend a strategy for enhancing performance and strategically positioning UNDP support within national development priorities and UNDP corporate policy directions.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) launched a series of country programme evaluations, called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs), in order to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP contributions to development results at the country level. Undertaken in selected countries, the ADRs focus on outcomes, critically examine achievements and constraints in the UNDP thematic areas of focus, draw lessons learned and provide recommendations for the future. The ADRs also recommend strategies for enhancing performance and strategically positioning UNDP support within national development priorities and UNDP corporate policy directions.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme has launched a series of country evaluations, called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs), in order to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. Undertaken in selected countries, the ADRs focus on outcomes and critically examine achievements, and constraints, in the UNDP thematic areas of focus, draw lessons learned and provide recommendations for the future. The ADRs will also recommend a strategy for enhancing performance and strategically positioning UNDP support within national development priorities and UNDP corporate policy directions.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) conducts country evaluations called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs) to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. ADRs are carried out within the overall provisions contained in the UNDP Evaluation Policy. The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) conducts country evaluations called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs) to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. ADRs are carried out within the overall provisions contained in the UNDP Evaluation Policy.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) regularly conducts a number of country evaluations called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs), in order to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP contribution to development results at the country level. The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) regularly conducts a number of country evaluations called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs), in order to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP contribution to development results at the country level.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) conducts country evaluations called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs) to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level. The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) conducts country evaluations called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs) to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP’s contributions to development results at the country level.

This Assessment of Development Results (ADR) in China is a country-level evaluation to assess the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) overall performance and contribution to development in China since 2006. It provides stakeholders an objective assessment of UNDP work and evaluates the effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of UNDP programmes. It also examines UNDP strategic positioning in China as well as relevance and responsiveness to China’s development priorities and needs. Central questions for the evaluation are how and whether UNDP has used its comparative advantage and its overall support to further China’s development effectiveness in fulfilling national development priorities and the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In doing so, the analysis assesses the intended outcomes as articulated in the UNDP Country Programme Document (CPD) for China (2006-2010).

This report reviews the contributions of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to development results in Georgia from 2001 to the present. It examines the interventions of UNDP from a strategic perspective, assessing how it designed its programme to address the key development issues, the relevance of the programme and the role of UNDP within the development assistance to the country. The report goes on to assess the impact of the interventions of UNDP under its various thematic areas. Based on this analysis, the report lays out the findings and proposes recommendations for future programmes. This evaluation process, known as an Assessment of Development Results, was carried out by a group of three independent consultants contracted directly by the UNDP Evaluation Office (EO).This report reviews the contributions of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to development results in Georgia from 2001 to the present. It examines the interventions of UNDP from a strategic perspective, assessing how it designed its programme to address the key development issues, the relevance of the programme and the role of UNDP within the development assistance to the country. The report goes on to assess the impact of the interventions of UNDP under its various thematic areas. Based on this analysis, the report lays out the findings and proposes recommendations for future programmes. This evaluation process, known as an Assessment of Development Results, was carried out by a group of three independent consultants contracted directly by the UNDP Evaluation Office (EO).

Assessments of Development Results (ADRs) are an independent evaluation of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)’s contribution to the development results in countries where the organization operates. This ADR was launched by the Evaluation Office (EO) of UNDP in 2011. UNDP’s contribution to national development efforts was assessed against the following criteria: thematic relevance; effectiveness; efficiency; and sustainability. UNDP’s strategic position was assessed against the following criteria: strategic relevance and responsiveness, making the most of UNDP’s comparative strength, and promotion of UN values from a human development perspective.

This report (RE-240) by the Evaluation Office presents the findings of an evaluation of the cooperation between the Bank and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in the execution of Bank-funded programs. The evaluation reviewed the UNDP's role in project execution and identified issues that warrant further discussion in the interest of increasing development effectiveness and optimizing the benefits of the collaboration for both the Borrowers and the Bank. Information for this study was gathered from IDB project documents and execution reports, UNDP project documents, completed questionnaires soliciting the views of Bank and UNDP field staff on the relationship at the country level, and interviews with more than 50 government, UNDP and Bank officials. Four countries -Argentina, Bolivia, Peru and Panama- were selected for the in-country fieldwork, because each had several ongoing Bank loans and/or technical assistance operations on which the UNDP was collaborating in project execution.

The Evaluation Office (EO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) conducts country evaluations called Assessments of Development Results (ADRs) to capture and demonstrate evaluative evidence of UNDP contributions to development results at the country level. ADRs are carried out within the overall provisions contained in the UNDP Evaluation Policy.