Abstract
A comparison between the immunofluorescent (IF) method for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) activity and the immunoperoxidase (IP) method by peroxidase-anti-peroxidase (PAP) technique was done for 100 cases of acute leukemia. For the acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALL) there was agreement in 93% of the cases. However, the IP method detected 51/55 (93%) TdT+ cases versus 47/55 (85%) by the IF method. For the acute nonlymphocytic leukemias (ANLL), there was an agreement in 89% of the cases. The IP method detected 8/36 (22%) TdT-positive cases while IF detected 4/36 (11%) positive cases. If a figure of 10% TdT+ cells is considered significant in the marrow of the ANLLs, then the IP method would detect eight additional cases for a total of 16/36 (44%) TdT+ cases. This latter figure questions the ability of the IP TdT assay as a single test adequately to determine the lineage of a cell line. It may be rather that TdT is a marker that is expressed in a stem cell.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
