Abstract

To evaluate how changes in complication and failure to rescue rates influence hospitals' postoperative mortality rates. Surgical mortality has declined over the last decade, but the mechanisms underlying these improvements are unknown. Specifically, the relative impact of reducing postoperative complications versus improving "failure to rescue" remains unclear. Using Medicare claims data, we performed a retrospective study of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, pulmonary resection, colectomy, and pancreatectomy patients. We examined risk-adjusted 30-day mortality, serious complications, and failure to rescue for these patients in from 2005 to 2014 (n = 702,268 patients in 3404 hospitals). Hospitals were then stratified into quintiles by their change in mortality over time. After stratifying by reductions in mortality from 2005 to 2014, the top 20% of hospitals decreased mortality by 37% (9.0%-5.7%, P < 0.001), decreased serious complications by 11% (15.2%-13.5%, P < 0.001), and decreased failure to rescue by 25% (25.2%-18.9%, P < 0.001). In contrast, the bottom 20% of hospitals increased mortality by 12% (6.9%-7.7%, P < 0.001), increased serious complications by 5% (14.6%-15.4%, P < 0.001), and increased failure to rescue by 4% (21.5%-22.3%, P < 0.001). Partitioning of variance demonstrated that decreased failure to rescue explained 64% of improvement in hospitals' mortality over time, whereas decreased serious complications accounted for only 5% of this improvement. Hospitals with the largest reductions in surgical mortality achieved these improvements primarily through reducing failure to rescue rates and not by reducing serious complication rates. This suggests that hospitals aiming to reduce surgical mortality should engage in efforts focused on improving rescue.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.