Abstract

The global community is currently grappling with multiple and overlapping social and environmental threats. These include the climate emergency, COVID-19 and the threat of widespread hunger, and the accelerating loss of biodiversity. All of these threats point to an urgent need to restore and sustainably manage land and forests. Studies are pointing to the critical role of tenure reform, and in particular strengthening collective forest tenure, as an effective means to reduce deforestation, mitigate climate change, restore ecosystem services and maintain biodiversity. Since the 1970s, countries worldwide have attempted to better recognize the customary rights of local communities. Yet despite over 40 years of effort, collective forest tenure reforms have yielded only moderate results. This article draws on recent assessments conducted in 23 countries by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) on community-based forestry and associated forest tenure regimes based on the internationally endorsed Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (the VGGT). The findings suggest that governments are increasingly giving legal recognition to community rights to use both timber and non-timber forest products for commercial purposes. Yet, the tenure provided to collective forestry is less robust than that held by companies and smallholders in a number of ways. These include fewer legal protections, more barriers to the use of these rights, inadequate access to justice, and less administrative support in documenting rights. Furthermore, in many cases the existing community forestry legal provisions are not implemented. The relatively successful cases suggest that with robust tenure, communities and smallholders can be potent vehicles for moving towards sustainable forest management and mitigating climate change, improving local livelihoods, contributing to timber and non-timber product economies, and achieving several of the Sustainable Development Goals. But for this, governments will need to strengthen community and local rights within their legal frameworks and mainstream implementation in government policies and practices. Non-governmental organizations, civil society organizations, donors, research institutions and academia can provide important support through policy implementation, research, and ensuring inclusive policy formulation processes.

Highlights

  • The global community is currently grappling with multiple and overlapping social and environmental threats

  • Studies are increasingly pointing to the critical role of land and forest tenure reforms (Global Landscapes Forum (GLF) 2019),1 and in particular strengthening collective forest tenure, as an effective means to reduce deforestation, mitigate climate change, maintain biodiversity and restore ecosystem services (Fa et al, 2020a, Fa et al, 2020; Garnett et al, 2018; RRI, 2018; WRI, 2016)

  • Rights recognition The assessment findings show that all 23 countries have adopted tenure reforms recognizing collective rights to forests as an important aspect of strengthening public participation in forest management. Until recently, such tenure reforms were often limited to the allocation of degraded forests for subsistence use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global community is currently grappling with multiple and overlapping social and environmental threats These include the climate emergency, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the threat of widespread hunger, and the accelerating loss of biodiversity. All of these threats point to an urgent need to restore and sustainably manage land and forests. Forest Policy and Economics 123 (2021) 102376 and Latin America are legally owned or designated for use by local communities including indigenous peoples (RRI, 2020) This figure en­ compasses communal territories of indigenous and traditional peoples and excludes areas under co-management regimes on public lands. Despite over 40 years of implementation, why have these tenure approaches yielded only moderate results? To answer this question, this article draws on recent assessments conducted by FAO on communitybased forestry and associated forest tenure regimes based on the inter­ nationally endorsed Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Gover­ nance of Tenure (often referred to as the VGGT) (FAO, 2012a)

Recent FAO research
Legal limitations and unfinished reforms
Forest tenure assessments were conducted in
Towards remedy
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call