Abstract
This paper explores the politics of field research affecting the investigation of an unknown fatal disease (kuru) that afflicted the Fore people of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. From its outset in 1957, the kuru inquiry was characterized by professional rivalries and political manoeuvring. At the centre of the political jostling was the chauvinistic resentment of Australian scientists over the presence and activities of an American researcher, Carleton Gajdusek. Increasing tensions prompted the regulation of kuru research through the appointment in 1963 of a New Zealand neurologist, Richard Hornabrook, as the Chief Clinical Investigator. Against the background of earlier tensions, the paper examines the relationship between Gajdusek and Hornabrook as an illustration of the politics of research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
