Abstract

The superiorities in construction time, cost, and quality of precast RC structures are accompanied by the challenges in connection, particularly in steel bars connections between RC components. The extensively used steel bar connections for either grouted sleeve splice connection or grouted spiral-confined lap connection requires on-site grouting, which is a concealed construction process with increased the risk of grouting defects, thereby impairing connection reliability. The confined headed bar connection (CHBC) with visible on-site construction has been proposed to address the unseen grouting defects concerns. However, modern structures that use large-diameter or high-strength rebars present higher demands for steel bar connection capacity. For CHBC, it is suggested to use either a long connection length or a large-size head to satisfy the capacity demand. However, the long connection length can increase field wet operation, which is disadvantage in precast concrete construction. The large-size head can help reduce the connection length, but it can cause inconvenience including construction congestion and the increased eccentric bending moment under tension. This paper presents the CHBC with double-head configuration, which can reduce the single head size. The proposed CHBC consists of confinement stirrups and two overlapped headed bars and the stirrup confining the core concrete can also improve the CHBC capacity. Experimental investigation on 21 CHBC specimens has been carried out. The failure modes, bearing capacity, and stirrup strain development have been studied. Effects of the double-head configuration and confinement stirrup ratio have been analyzed through experimental and numerical investigation. Results show that the double-head configuration has a minor impact on the tensile capacity of CHBC while the increase of confined stirrup ratio can improve the tensile capacity of CHBC. Configuration details of size and spacing for stirrup reinforcement in CHBC are proposed. Based on the test results, CHBC tensile capacity prediction method is suggested, which can take the head configuration into account.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.