Tennis Balls: "Henry V" and Testicular Masculinity, or, According to the "OED", Shakespeare Doesn't Have Any Balls

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessTennis Balls: "Henry V" and Testicular Masculinity, or, According to the "OED", Shakespeare Doesn't Have Any BallsREBECCA ANN BACHREBECCA ANN BACH Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Renaissance Drama Volume 301999-2001Institutions of the Text Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/rd.30.41917353 Views: 10Total views on this site Citations: 4Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright © 2001 Northwestern University PressPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Susan Sachon Titus Andronicus and Henry V: Bodies, Objects and Text, (Dec 2019): 151–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05207-2_5Jennifer Panek “This Base Stallion Trade”: He‐whores and Male Sexuality on the Early Modern Stage, English Literary Renaissance 40, no.33 (Nov 2016): 357–392.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6757.2010.01072.xCaroline Bicks Stones Like Women's Paps: Revising Gender in Jane Sharp's Midwives Book, Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 7, no.22 (Oct 2007): 1–27.https://doi.org/10.2979/JEM.2007.7.2.1 Alison A. Chapman Flaying Bartholomew: Jonson’s Hagiographic Parody Chapman, Modern Philology 101, no.44 (Jul 2015): 511–541.https://doi.org/10.1086/423632