Abstract
The Delaware Supreme Court has recently cleared a path for controlling shareholders to freeze out minority shareholders through a combination of a tender offer and a short-form merger. This article defends that doctrinal development against recent attacks from a number of commentators. I conclude that the risks of coercion are slight in this context and that minority shareholders are unlikely to benefit from more intrusive judicial scrutiny.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
