Abstract

Temporary advantages theory suggests that firms can outperform rivals in hypercompetitive environments by frequently launching competitive, innovative and pioneering actions. However, when firms introduce new actions with increasing frequency, they face acceleration-cost tradeoffs; as action becomes more frequent, the costs for developing actions rise exponentially, negatively affecting profitability. This study shows that action frequency affects firm profitability in a curvilinear, inverted U-shaped pattern; as action frequency increases, profitability diminishes. This pattern can be altered – firms can weaken acceleration-cost tradeoffs and enhance profitability by developing appropriate alliance network structures. For firms pursuing moderate levels of action frequency, both dense and sparse network structures can enhance profitability. For firms pursuing low or very high action frequency, sparse networks are advantageous.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.