Abstract

In this paper, I argue that Heidegger's phenomenological investigation of boredom offers important clues for better understanding the notoriously difficult notion of non-objectifying intentionality (Langsintentionalitat). I begin by examining Husserl's account of the aporetic nature of self-temporalization and I claim that a discussion of moods can further clarify the relation between Langsintentionalitat and the absolute time-constituting consciousness. Although Husserl himself broached the problem of the intentionality of moods, it was Heidegger who gave us a full-blown account of it. I point out the correspondences between Heidegger's morphology of boredom and Husserl's analysis of temporal syntheses and I argue that the concept of absolute consciousness has much to gain from being confronted with the idea of 'genuine boredom'.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call