Abstract

The aim of this work was to identify processes that cause surface CO2 partial pressure (pCO2W) and air–water CO2 flux (FCO2) variations at a coastal location in the California Current System, from semidiurnal to interannual time scales. Such processes may include sea breeze, upwelling, El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycle, and “The Blob” (strong positive temperature anomalies in the NE Pacific). Sea surface temperature (SST, 2008–2014) and pCO2W (2008–2015) time series were generated with data collected from a MAPCO2 buoy anchored at 100 m depth and 5 km from Punta Banda (31.6ºN, 116.6ºW), Baja California, México. There were significant changes in SST, pCO2W, and FCO2 that lasted periods that were as short as a few hours and as large as interannual time frames. Spectral analysis showed significant semidiurnal, diurnal, ~15-d, and ~28-d components of variation. Time series were divided into periods according to the Multivariate ENSO Index and the Blob event. Bayesian t tests show that both pCO2W and FCO2 had high credibility of being different between periods. During La Niña conditions (2010–2011), maximum pCO2W and FCO2 values were higher, and the minimum values were lower, than during “normal,” El Niño, and Blob conditions. The pCO2W range during this La Niña event was from 131 to 864 µatm, and the FCO2 range was from–6.9 to 40.4 mmol C·m–2·d–1. The FCO2 range during the Blob was from near equilibrium to ~2.5 mmol C·m–2·d–1. The extreme values for the FCO2 integral (± standard error), for all periods, were –57.0 ± 0.01 mmol C·m–2 for El Niño, and 257.0 ± 0.03 mmol C·m–2 for La Niña. Themean FCO2 value (± standard error) was 0.04 ± 0.02 mol C·m–2·yr–1. The buoy location was found to be a very weak source of CO2 during thestudy period.

Highlights

  • The main challenge for research on costal CO2 flux (FCO2) is to have enough data to identify the processes controlling its variability

  • There was a large spectrum of sea surface temperature (SST), pCO2W, U10, and flujo aire-agua del CO2 (FCO2) variations, with periods as short as few hours and as large as interannual time frames (Figs. 2–5)

  • There were enough data to run spectral analysis and to test for differences between conditions: daylight vs night, strong upwelling vs weak upwelling seasons, El Niño vs La Niña, and Blob vs no Blob

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main challenge for research on costal CO2 flux (FCO2) is to have enough data to identify the processes controlling its variability. PCO2W changes with mesoscale (Turi et al 2014) and sub-mesoscale (Klein and Lapeyre 2009) processes, such as eddies and meanders in combination with physiographic (e.g., points, capes, islands) and bathymetric heterogeneity (Laruelle et al 2014). This leads to a complex mosaic of pCO2W changes in space and time, and substantial measurement efforts are needed to reliably determine the role of the region as a CO2 source or sink (Turi et al 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call