Abstract
Spatial and temporal variations of coda wave attenuation were identified in many studies, and particularly in relation to major earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Both the coda quality factor, Q c, and its frequency dependence often change following such events, which is often attributed to variations in the properties of large volumes of the subsurface. However, Q c is also strongly sensitive to the assumed theoretical models, which are usually insufficiently accurate for constraining the actual relationships between the geometrical spreading, anelastic dissipation, and scattering. This inaccuracy often leads to significant exaggeration of attenuation effects and complicates the interpretation of temporal variations. To resolve this problem, this study uses a phenomenological approach based on the temporal attenuation coefficient χ instead of Q c. The attenuation coefficient often linearly depends on frequency f, with intercept γ = χ ( 0 ) related to the geometrical spreading and slope giving the “effective quality” factor Q e as d χ / df = π Q e - 1 . Two published examples of temporal variations of local-earthquake coda are revisited: a non-volcanic (Stone Canyon in central California) and volcanic area (Mount St. Helens, Washington). In both cases, linear χ ( f ) patterns are found, with the effects of γ on coda decay rates being significantly stronger than those of Q e - 1 . At Stone Canyon, γ ranged from 0.035 to 0.06 s −1 and Q e varied from 3000 to 10,000, with γ increasing and Q e decreasing during the winter season. At Mount St. Helens, γ remained constant at ∼0.18 s −1, and Q e changed from 400 before the eruption to 750 after it. The observed temporal variations are explained by the near-surface changes caused by seasonal variations in the non-volcanic case and gas-, magma-, and geothermal-system related in the volcanic case. Scattering attenuation does not appear to be a significant factor in these areas, or otherwise it may be indistinguishable due to its fundamental trade-off with the background structure and anelastic attenuation in the data.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.