Abstract

Increased awareness around neurocognitive deficits after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) has progressed the search for objective, diagnostic, and monitoring tools, yet imaging biomarkers for mTBI and recovery are not established in clinical use. It has been suggested that mTBI impairs cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) to CO2, which could be related to post-concussive syndrome (PCS). We investigate CVR evolution after mTBI using blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and possible correlation with PCS. A prospective cohort of 25 mTBI patients and 18 matched controls underwent BOLD MRI CVR measurements. A subset of 19 mTBI patients underwent follow-up testing. Visits took place at a mean of 63 and 180 days after injury. Symptoms were assessed with the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2). Symptoms, CVR and brain volume [gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and whole brain (WB)], age, and sex, were examined between groups and longitudinally within traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Traumatic brain injury participants were 72% males, mean age being 42.7 years. Control participants were 61% with mean age of 38.7 years. SCAT2 scores tended to improve among those mTBI patients with follow-up visits (p = 0.07); however, they did not tend to recover to scores of the healthy controls. Brain volumes were not statistically different between groups at the first visit (WM p = 0.71; GM p = 0.36). In mTBI patients, there was a reduction in GM volume between visits 1 and 2 (p = 0.0046). Although mean CVR indexes were similar (WM p = 0.27; GM p = 0.36; and WB p = 0.35), the correlation between SCAT2 and CVR was negative in controls (WM-r = -0.59; p = 0.010; GM-r = -0.56; p = 0.016; brain-r = -0.58; p = 0.012) and weaker and positive in mTBI (brain-r = 0.4; p = 0.046; GM-r = 0.4; p = 0.048). SCAT2 correlated with GM volume (r = 0.5215, p = 0.0075) in mTBI but not in controls (r = 0.2945, p = 0.2355). There is a correlation between lower GM CVR indexes and lower performance on SCAT2 in patients with mTBI, which seems to be associated with more symptoms. This correlation seems to persist well beyond 120 days. mTBI may lead to a decrease in GM volume in these patients.

Highlights

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a silent worldwide epidemic

  • The main findings in this study were that [1] patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), even if minimally symptomatic, showed lower Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) scores compared to controls, a finding that persisted in the 180 days after injury; [2] in patients with mTBI, a positive correlation between SCAT2 scores, gray matter (GM), and brain cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) indexes was seen, while in healthy controls this correlation was negative; this correlation is more evident in the initial test; and [3] a detectable loss in GM volume in patients was evident in the mTBI patients when comparing early and delayed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

  • We showed that GM CVR is better correlated with symptoms; this finding is in agreement with previous studies using transcranial Doppler (TCD), since TCD is usually used to measure middle cerebral artery (MCA) blood flow velocity, the main supplier of hemispheric GM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a silent worldwide epidemic. Persistent symptoms represent a personal burden to individual patients and a socioeconomic issue, considering that most patients with TBI are relatively young [2]. Functional imaging appears to increase the sensitivity for detecting abnormalities [6], and it has been suggested that it might even help to predict outcome in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients [7]. Especially in MRI techniques, allow the identification of a subgroup of mTBI patients where microscopic axonal damage occurs despite normal standard imaging. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), measuring microstructural changes, suggests that there are significant differences between mTBI patients and healthy individuals even if gross anatomical abnormalities cannot be seen on CT or MRI [8, 9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.