Abstract

BackgroundManagement of elderly patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) continues to be a source of controversy due to underrepresentation in large-scale clinical trials and the increased risk of adverse outcomes after both invasive (Percutaneous coronary intervention and Coronary artery bypass grafting) and non-invasive therapies. Recent randomized clinical trials have shown improved short term and intermediate term outcomes among high risk NSTEMI patients receiving early invasive management versus conservative medical management. However, how this is reflected in U.S. clinical practice for elderly patients has not been reported.ObjectiveTo identify the trend of invasive management in patients with NSTEMI, particularly among elderly population.MethodsWe used data from National Hospital Discharge Survey to identify all adult patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for NSTEMI from the years 2005 to 2009. The goal was to investigate the trends in time of invasive therapy for patients diagnosed with NSTEMI. We then stratified the patients according to age >65 and ≤65, and compared the temporal trends between two age groups.ResultsAmong 21,306 patients diagnosed with NSTEMI between 2005 and 2009, the median age was 73 years (IQR: 61-82 years), 54% were males and 57% were White. The proportions of patients age>65 years receiving invasive management (21%, N=13978) was significantly lower than those age≤65 (41%, N=7328) (p<0.001). Moreover, in both age groups, the proportion of patients receiving early invasive management decreased substantially over time (p<0.001).ConclusionDespite numerous studies promoting the use of early invasive management for NSTEMI patients, the proportion of patients receiving invasive intervention gradually decreased from 2005-2009, more so in elderly population. The decrease seen in overall proportion of patients receiving invasive therapy could be associated with older median age of NSTEMI patients; 73 years (IQR: 61-82). Our future analyses will investigate if this trend maintains after adjusting for other factors (sex, co-morbid conditions, insurance status, year of procedure, hospital region, and hospital bed-size) thought to be associated with the management of NSTEMI in elderly patients.

Highlights

  • Acute coronary syndrome can present as unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

  • From 2005-2009 we identified 21,306 hospitalizations in the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) with a diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI), of which 5,939 had a procedure code for angiography or coronary artery bypass surgery. 65.60% were greater than 65 years of age and 54% of the patients were male (Table 1)

  • This study demonstrated that invasive therapy for NSTEMI was more common in patients who are less than 65 years of age

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute coronary syndrome can present as unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Management of elderly patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) continues to be a source of controversy due to underrepresentation in large-scale clinical trials and the increased risk of adverse outcomes after both invasive (Percutaneous coronary intervention and Coronary artery bypass grafting) and non-invasive therapies. Recent randomized clinical trials have shown improved short term and intermediate term outcomes among high risk NSTEMI patients receiving early invasive management versus conservative medical management. How this is reflected in U.S clinical practice for elderly patients has not been reported

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call