Abstract

Scarcity of affordable energy efficient dwellings is a defining characteristic of the global housing crisis. In many countries this problem has been exacerbated by single objective cost-models which favour the homogeneous development of market tenures at the expense of delivering high-quality affordable homes. Despite the obvious environmental and fuel-poverty alleviation benefits of advanced energy performance standards, such as Passivhaus, they are often dismissed as an affordable housing solution due to elevated build-cost premiums. The present work attempts to reconcile this housing affordability – energy performance nexus by establishing a novel decision support framework for Passivhaus design using genetic multi-objective optimization. The use of constrained genetic algorithms coupled to the Passive House Planning Package software is shown to produce cost optimal designs which are fully compliant with the Passivhaus standard. The findings also reveal that the precise choice of Passivhaus certification criteria has significant impacts on overheating risks using future probabilistic climate data. This means that the design implications of using either the peak heating load or annual heating demand certification criteria must be temporally evaluated to ensure resilient whole-life design outcomes. In a typical UK context, the findings show that affordable Passivhaus dwelling construction costs can be reduced by up to £366/m2 (or 22% of build cost). Use of this evidence-based decision support tool could thereby enable local authorities and developers to make better-informed decisions in relation to cost optimal trade-offs between achieving advanced energy performance standards and the viability of large affordable housing developments.

Highlights

  • The domestic housing sector accounts for over a quarter of energy use and carbon dioxide emissions in the UK [1] and a similar proportion of European final energy consumption [2]

  • We show the results for the optimization of the construction cost objective with either the annual heating demand or peak heating load used as a secondary objective

  • Comparison will be made between the two heating criteria to determine whether one approach leads to better outcomes in terms of capital construction costs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The domestic housing sector accounts for over a quarter of energy use and carbon dioxide emissions in the UK [1] and a similar proportion of European final energy consumption [2] As such it represents one of the largest sectoral areas to address when considering emission reductions required to meet the UK Climate Change Act [3] (an act binding the UK Government to nation-wide emission targets) and the Paris. Applied Energy 261 (2020) 114383 reported both in the UK [7] and world-wide [8] These two issues create a complex problem: how to supply more affordable homes without introducing significant carbon dioxide emissions or elevated build costs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call