Abstract

AbstractTemporal evolution of relationships between surface temperature and modes of low‐frequency circulation variability is compared between five reanalyses (20CRv3, 20CRv2c, ERA‐20C, JRA‐55, and NCEP‐1) in winter from 1958 to 2010 over the northern Extratropics. The relationships are evaluated using 15‐year running correlations between temperature anomalies (from the CRU TS v. 4.03 data set) and the intensity of circulation modes (detected in 500 hPa heights by rotated principal component analysis). The analysis, utilizing mean absolute differences between time series of running correlations, points to the large agreement between ERA‐20C, JRA‐55, and NCEP‐1. Circulation modes in those reanalyses are highly similar, which in turn lead to the agreement in temporal development of correlations. In contrast, relationships of some circulation modes with temperature in 20CRv3 and 20CRv2c differ due to differences in the position, strength, and shape of the action centres. This concerns circulation modes located over Eurasia and the Atlantic, mainly North Atlantic Oscillation and Eurasian mode type 1 (EU1). Composite maps, calculated for all running periods, indicate dissimilar temporal evolution of action centres in both 20CR reanalyses. Increased differences in correlations occur mainly during periods when the position and strength of action centres diverge the most. Relationships of circulation modes located over North America and the Pacific with temperature share large resemblance between all reanalyses, including those from the 20CR family. Differences appear to be smaller in 20CRv3 compared to the preceding version, 20CRv2(c), suggesting that the development of the 20CR reanalysis has succeeded in correcting and diminishing biases.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call