Abstract

Global biodiversity declines associated with anthropogenic stressors have motivated researchers to implement monitoring programs to estimate species richness for major taxonomic groups. Due to logistical challenges of species identification, there have been efforts to use biological and abiotic surrogates as indicators of species richness targets. An effective surrogate has two essential features: first, it takes less time, money, and experience to measure than the target and second, it maintains a consistently strong correlation with the target over space and time. Few studies, however, have explicitly investigated surrogate effectiveness over time, and those that have are typically quite short. Our main aim was thus to study how surrogate-target relationships vary in space and time, with a particular emphasis on multi-decadal temporal changes. We used coral reefs as a study system because they support high biodiversity and have been strongly affected globally over the past several decades by natural and anthropogenic stressors. Coral reef assessments have primarily focused on monitoring species richness of fish and hard corals due to the ecological and economical value of these taxonomic groups. The species richness of these conspicuous, well-studied taxonomic groups has been extrapolated to represent the richness of other coral reef taxa or to represent total species richness of coral reefs. However, the reliability of these extrapolations is not well-studied, and we used sponges as a case study to assess whether surrogates for fish and coral species richness can be used to predict the richness of other groups. We selected two simple biotic surrogates (total coral cover and total sponge cover) and one abiotic surrogate (reef rugosity) to predict richness of corals, fish, sponges, and richness of the three groups pooled. To study how these surrogate-target relationships vary over time and space we used 27 years of monitoring data from eight sites around Guana Island in the British Virgin Islands. Our first objective was to determine which of three candidate surrogates (coral cover, sponge cover, rugosity) was most strongly correlated with each of four separate targets (species richness of corals, fishes, sponges, and richness of the three groups pooled). To address this objective, we compared a set of simple models of each of the candidate surrogates as predictors using AICc. We found that, of our candidate surrogates, coral cover was the best surrogate for coral and sponge richness and rugosity was the best surrogate for fish richness and richness of the three groups pooled. Our

Highlights

  • Biodiversity declines associated with increasing levels of anthropogenic impact are of great concern because they reflect loss of species, disruption of community dynamics and diminished ecosystem function (Dobson et al, 2006; Duffy, 2009; Ehrlich & Wilson, 1991; Naeem, Thompson, Lawler, Lawton, & Woodfin, 1994; Staudinger et al, 2013; Stork, 2010)

  • Our findings suggest that monitoring of cost-effective surrogates is appropriate in tracking changes in the relative species richness of coral reef communities and that priority areas selected using a one-off spatial survey are likely to retain the features that made them priority areas

  • We examined simple correlations between the targets because fish and coral richness have been used as cross-taxa surrogates in the past

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biodiversity declines associated with increasing levels of anthropogenic impact are of great concern because they reflect loss of species, disruption of community dynamics and diminished ecosystem function (Dobson et al, 2006; Duffy, 2009; Ehrlich & Wilson, 1991; Naeem, Thompson, Lawler, Lawton, & Woodfin, 1994; Staudinger et al, 2013; Stork, 2010). Documenting these declines is based on tracking different aspects of biodiversity (i.e. landscape, ecosystem, taxonomic, and genetic) over time and space (Duelli & Obrist, 2003; Noss, 1990). Surrogates are simple indicators that provide an estimate of a target component of biodiversity, often referred to more as a target (Noss, 1990)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call