Abstract

Intercropping, i.e., the simultaneous cultivation of different crops on the same field, has demonstrated yield advantages compared to monoculture cropping. These yield advantages have often been attributed to complementary resource use, but few studies quantified the temporal complementarity of nutrient acquisition and biomass production. Our understanding of how nutrient uptake rates of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) and biomass accumulation change throughout the growing season and between different neighbors is limited. We conducted weekly destructive harvests to measure temporal trajectories of N and P uptake and biomass production in three crop species (oat, lupin, and camelina) growing either as isolated single plants, in monocultures or as intercrops. Additionally, we quantified organic acid exudation in the rhizosphere and biological N2-fixation of lupin throughout the growing season. Logistic models were fitted to characterize nutrient acquisition and biomass accumulation trajectories. Nutrient uptake and biomass accumulation trajectories were curtailed by competitive interactions, resulting in earlier peak rates and lower total accumulated nutrients and biomass compared to cultivation as isolated single plants. Different pathways led to overyielding in the two mixtures. The oat–camelina mixture was characterized by a shift from belowground temporal niche partitioning of resource uptake to aboveground competition for light during the growing season. The oat–lupin mixture showed strong competitive interactions, where lupin eventually overyielded due to reliance on atmospheric N and stronger competitiveness for soil P compared to oat. Synthesis: This study demonstrates temporal shifts to earlier peak rates of plants growing with neighbors compared to those growing alone, with changes in uptake patterns suggesting that observed temporal shifts in our experiment were driven by competitive interactions rather than active plant behavior to reduce competition. The two differing pathways to overyielding in the two mixtures highlight the importance of examining temporal dynamics in intercropping systems to understand the underlying mechanisms of overyielding.

Highlights

  • Intercropping, i.e., the simultaneous growth of two or more species in the same field for all or part of their growing period, is a promising tool to sustainably maintain or increase yields by increasing diversity, maintaining natural ecosystem services and thereby limiting the input of agrochemicals (Lithourgidis et al, 2011; Brooker et al, 2016)

  • No significant differences in biomass accumulation rates or nutrient uptake rates between mixtures, monocultures, and isolated singles were observed for any species (Table 1), except for biomass accumulation rate of isolated single lupin, which was significantly higher than when the species was grown in a monoculture

  • The methodological approach first applied by Trinder et al (2012) allowed us to analyze the dynamics of competitive plant resource capture and biomass accumulation at two different diversity levels and compare them to isolated single plants that did not experience competitive interactions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intercropping, i.e., the simultaneous growth of two or more species in the same field for all or part of their growing period, is a promising tool to sustainably maintain or increase yields by increasing diversity, maintaining natural ecosystem services and thereby limiting the input of agrochemicals (Lithourgidis et al, 2011; Brooker et al, 2016). Overyielding, i.e., when the productivity of a mixture exceeds the expected yields of the monocultures, in intercropping can occur due to resource complementarity, where two or more species of an intercrop acquire different resources or acquire the same resources at different places belowground (Hauggaard-Nielsen et al, 2001; Li et al, 2018) or at different times (Yu et al, 2015; Zhang W.-P. et al, 2017; Dong et al, 2018) This reduces niche overlap and competition between individuals in the intercrop. Tracking the temporal dynamism of these processes is intercrop systems is extremely valuable in helping us discover plant behavior for niche complementarity and potential mechanisms for yield benefits of intercropping

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.