Abstract

BackgroundWe investigated how temporal context affects the learning of arbitrary visuo-motor associations. Human observers viewed highly distinguishable, fractal objects and learned to choose for each object the one motor response (of four) that was rewarded. Some objects were consistently preceded by specific other objects, while other objects lacked this task-irrelevant but predictive context.ResultsThe results of five experiments showed that predictive context consistently and significantly accelerated associative learning. A simple model of reinforcement learning, in which three successive objects informed response selection, reproduced our behavioral results.ConclusionsOur results imply that not just the representation of a current event, but also the representations of past events, are reinforced during conditional associative learning. In addition, these findings are broadly consistent with the prediction of attractor network models of associative learning and their prophecy of a persistent representation of past objects.

Highlights

  • We investigated how temporal context affects the learning of arbitrary visuo-motor associations

  • Our aim was to keep observers engaged in the immediate task and to discourage as far as possible any performance strategies relying on temporal context

  • Behavioral results To ascertain whether temporal context influences the process of associative learning, we conducted five behavioral experiments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We investigated how temporal context affects the learning of arbitrary visuo-motor associations. The experimental design takes a set of visual stimuli from the same category and maps them randomly onto a set of motor responses. Subjects learn by trial and error which response produces the reward in the case of each stimulus (e.g., if stimulus A, response X secures the reward). Subjects must link each stimulus to the specific response that ensures the reward in each case. This requires stimulus recognition and response selection, and keeping track of (at least some of) the stimulusresponse pairings already tried and the outcomes obtained. Depending on the size of the stimulus set, this may generate a considerable memory load

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call