Abstract
There is now ample evidence that when observers are asked to estimate features of an object they take into account recent stimulation history and blend the current sensory evidence with the recent stimulus intensity according to their reliability. Most of this evidence has been obtained via estimation or production paradigms both of which entail a conspicuous post-perceptual decision stage. So it is an unsolved question, as to whether the trace of previous stimulation contributes at the decision stage or as early as the perceptual stage. To this aim we focused on duration judgments, which typically exhibit strong central tendency effects and asked a duration comparison between two intervals, one of which characterized by high uncertainty. We found that the perceived duration of this interval regressed toward the average duration, demonstrating a genuine perceptual bias. Regression did not transfer between the visual and the auditory modality, indicating it is modality specific, but generalized across passively observed and actively produced intervals. These findings suggest that temporal central tendency effects modulate how long an interval appears to us and that integration of current sensory evidence can occur as early as in the sensory systems.
Highlights
There is ample evidence that when observers are asked to estimate features of an object they take into account recent stimulation history and blend the current sensory evidence with the recent stimulus intensity according to their reliability
Some of these judgments are reached with good sensory information but many, being it for short exposure, lack of attention or scarce sensory information are based on far-from-ideal sensory information
Much of the literature on central tendency effects is built upon estimation or reproduction paradigms which leave ample room for post-perceptual decision mechanisms[20]
Summary
There is ample evidence that when observers are asked to estimate features of an object they take into account recent stimulation history and blend the current sensory evidence with the recent stimulus intensity according to their reliability Most of this evidence has been obtained via estimation or production paradigms both of which entail a conspicuous post-perceptual decision stage. In the same manuscript Roach et al have reported that after some practice (4 or more sessions of 140 trials each) separate priors emerge even if a single motor response was requested This indicates that sensory systems have a capability of storing temporal context, but it requires time. The central research question of the present study asks if temporal regression of the mean exists on the perceptual level
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.