Abstract

The resolution of current satellite surface soil moisture (SM) estimates is very low, of tens of kilometers, which proves to be insufficient for various agricultural and hydrological applications. Amongst the existing downscaling approaches of remotely sensed SM, DISPATCH (DISaggregation based on a Physical And Theoretical scale CHange) improves the resolution of SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) soil moisture data using soil evaporative efficiency (SEE) estimates at high resolution (HR) and a SEE(SM) model implemented at low resolution (LR). Defined as the ratio of actual to potential soil evaporation, SEE can be derived from the remotely sensed land surface temperature (LST) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The current version of DISPATCH uses a linear SEE(SM) model. This study aims at improving the SEE(SM) model and testing different calibration strategies, to ultimately have more robust and better downscaled SM products. A nonlinear SEE(SM) model is introduced and its influence on the derived HR SM products is studied over a range of conditions. Each model, linear and nonlinear, is calibrated from remote sensing data on a daily and a multi-date basis. The approaches were tested over two mixed dry and irrigated areas in Catalonia, Spain, and over one dry area in Morocco. When using the linear model, better statistical results were generally obtained using a daily calibration (current version of DISPATCH), most notably over one Spanish site. However, the best results were systematically obtained for an annually calibrated nonlinear model, in terms of all metrics considered: correlation coefficient, slope of the linear regression, bias, unbiased root mean square error. In particular, when using the annually calibrated nonlinear SEE (SM) model, the temporal slope of the linear regression between disaggregated and in situ soil moisture increased to 1.16 and 0.75 for one Spanish site and for the Moroccan site (as opposed to 0.44 and 0.58, respectively, when using the linear model with a daily calibration). The temporal correlation coefficient increased to 0.47 and 0.54 over the Spanish sites (as opposed to 0.18 and 0.27, respectively, when using the linear model with a daily calibration). Those contrasted results indicate compensation effects between the model type and the calibration strategy. Taking into account studies that report the strong nonlinear behavior of the SEE with respect to SM, the introduction of the nonlinear SEE(SM) model in DISPATCH, combined with a multi-date calibration, is proven to perform significantly better under various conditions, leading to more robust disaggregated SM products. The SEE modeling based on the nonlinear SM model, with a multi-date calibration, could be integrated into the CATDS—Centre Aval de Traitement des Données SMOS as a future product, as well as into existing evapotranspiration models, which are based on a combination of thermal and microwave data.

Highlights

  • Soil moisture (SM) is an essential hydrologic variable that impacts evaporation, infiltration and runoff, playing an important role in energy and carbon exchanges [1]

  • Since the measurements for Urgell are short in time, we performed a temporal validation by adding Algerri Balaguer and MOR3, the latter site being added in order to test DISPATCH in an area that is not suitable for disaggregation

  • DISPATCH provides 1 km resolution soil moisture (SM) data from 40 km resolution SMOS and 1 km resolution MODIS data by combining MODIS-derived soil evaporative efficiency (SEE) estimates at high resolution (HR) and a SEE(SM) model implemented at low resolution (LR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil moisture (SM) is an essential hydrologic variable that impacts evaporation, infiltration and runoff, playing an important role in energy and carbon exchanges [1]. The downside to the operational retrieval of SM from microwave observations is given by the low resolution (LR) of the products, which ranges from 40 to 60 km [11,12], a resolution that is too coarse for most hydrological and agricultural applications [13,14]. Optical/thermal sensors have the advantage of providing data at medium and high resolutions. Even though optical data could be used to derive SM, the main drawback in deriving a retrieval methodology is given by the sensors’ sensitivity to meteorological conditions (including cloud presence) [15,16,17] and vegetation cover [15,18]. The main advantage of using SAR data is the high resolution it provides (several tens of meters). The main drawback is that it is difficult to account for the soil roughness and the vegetation backscattering effect in the soil moisture retrieval modeling [20,21,22]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call