Abstract

How we estimate the passage of time is an unsolved mystery in neuroscience. Illusions of subjective time provide an experimental access to this question. Here we show that time compression and expansion of visually marked intervals result from a binding of temporal interval markers. Interval markers whose onset signals were artificially weakened by briefly flashing a whole-field mask were bound in time towards markers with a strong onset signal. We explain temporal compression as the consequence of summing response distributions of weak and strong onset signals. Crucially, temporal binding occurred irrespective of the temporal order of weak and strong onset markers, thus ruling out processing latencies as an explanation for changes in interval duration judgments. If both interval markers were presented together with a mask or the mask was shown in the temporal interval center, no compression occurred. In a sequence of two intervals, masking the middle marker led to time compression for the first and time expansion for the second interval. All these results are consistent with a model view of temporal binding that serves a functional role by reducing uncertainty in the final estimate of interval duration.

Highlights

  • Similar arguments have been raised in the context of simultaneity illusions, where it has been claimed that marker correspondence and not neural processing latencies determines temporal binding of visual attributes[9]

  • We first asked whether the masking procedure - that marked the intervals in the main experiments - would change the temporal registration of the stimuli

  • We have shown that interval duration estimations are biased by temporal binding between interval markers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Similar arguments have been raised in the context of simultaneity illusions, where it has been claimed that marker correspondence and not neural processing latencies determines temporal binding of visual attributes[9]. This view rejects the idea that event time is inferred from brain time and instead suggests a postdictive estimation of time[10,11]. In the present study we aimed to find evidence for temporal binding in interval estimations To this end, we used a masking procedure that yields temporal interval compression[4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call