Template recognition and chain elongation in DNA synthesis in vitro

Abstract

DNA polymerase from Escherichia coli (Pol I) and from avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV polymerase) were compared for the manner in which they catalyze the polymerization of deoxynucleotides upon a variety of synthetic and natural templates. It was found that the rates of nucleotide incorporation with different natural RNAs were similar. Both polymerases have an associated RNA endonuclease which hydrolyses RNA templates containing double-stranded regions. This activity depends on the presence of the complementary deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and/or polymerization. Both enzymes copy natural DNA, which has been sonicated and treated with E. coli exonuclease III, at the same rate. However, avian myeloblastosis virus DNA polymerase, which has no associated DNA exonuclease activity, is unable to copy double-stranded DNA and copies DNAase-treated DNA only 10% as well as Pol I. Pol I copied all the homopolymers investigated at a greater rate than AMV polymerase with the exception of poly(C) · oligo(dG). However, the initial rate of chain elongation, as measured by gel electrophoresis, was the same for the two polymerases, approximately 300 nucleotides incorporated per minute. Template saturation experiments show a stoichiometric relationship between template and enzyme at optimal rates of nucleotide incorporation which suggests that all enzyme molecules are potential catalysts. Enzyme saturation experiments indicate that not all enzyme molecules are “effectively” bound to a template. Fewer AMV polymerase than Pol I molecules are functionally bound to a particular template. From these data, it is concluded that the two polymerases elongate DNA chains in a similar way and that the manner in which the polymerases bind to a particular template accounts for the discrepancies found in their turnover numbers.