Abstract

Shock temperature, stress, and dynamic emissivity for cerium shocked from 8.4 to 23.5 GPa were measured. In addition, the isentropic shock release temperature as a function of release stress was determined at a window interface. Cerium samples were shock compressed by plate impact on a single-stage gun. We made time-resolved measurements of thermal radiance, reflectance, and interface velocity of samples glued to lithium fluoride windows. Reflectance was measured with an integrating sphere and velocity with photonic Doppler velocimetry. From these measurements, we determined the temperature, emissivity, and stress at the interface. For shock stresses below 10.24 GPa, the samples were shocked from the γ phase into the α phase; at higher stresses, the cerium presumably melted or entered a mixed phase upon shock. The shock Hugoniot temperature as a function of stress follows a straight line over the entire range of our measurements, disagreeing with previously published predictions that the Hugoniot would follow the melt boundary from 10.24 up to around 16–18 GPa. Between 11.9 and 16.8 GPa, all the release isentropes converged (within experimental uncertainty) to a point around 4 GPa and 900 K, near the published melt curve. For experiments shocked above ∼16 GPa, the release isentropes behave differently. This suggests that within this 12–16 GPa range, there is a phase transition taking place, probably melt, and that it is occurring somewhere along the shock and release path. We could not identify a single-valued phase boundary from our experiments. Potential reasons for this are discussed.

Highlights

  • Exploring the dynamic material properties of metals with a complex response would improve physics models for these materials

  • Interface temperatures were derived from calibrated dynamic radiance measurements with a pyrometer and accompanying emissivity measurements with an integrating sphere

  • Shock stress values were determined from the impactor velocities and impedance matching

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Exploring the dynamic (shock wave) material properties of metals with a complex response would improve physics models for these materials. Experimental techniques do not exist, and some techniques are not mature enough to produce relevant data. The latter condition is true for materials that have one or more phase transitions with pressure. To refine a multi-phase equation of state (EOS), it is necessary to measure the thermodynamic properties of the pure phases and to locate any phase transitions that cause the fundamental thermodynamic properties to change. Solid–liquid phase changes in metals can be difficult to study. They have been typically measured using sound speed measurements only on the principal shock Hugoniot (locus of single shock states) and only as a function of pressure, not temperature. To map out a complete temperature vs pressure melt curve T(P) requires temperature and pressure measurements on and off the principal Hugoniot

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call