Abstract

This work assesses the bondability and temperature cycling reliability of ultrasonic Al bonds on Molybdenum (Mo) and Molybdenum (di)Selenide (MoSe <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> ) layers of a Copper Indium Gallium (di)Selenide (CIGS) thin-film photovoltaic (TFPV) solar panel. The bondability and reliability of ultrasonic Al bonds were assessed using a qualitative load–displacement profile and quantitative peel force data obtained from a peel test, as well as contact resistance <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">R<sub>c</sub></i> measured using the transmission line method. It was discovered that using the peel test to examine the bondability and reliability of ultrasonic Al bonds and conductive adhesives was quite beneficial. Varied forms of ultrasonic Al bonds and conductive adhesives, either on Mo or MoSe <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> layers, have different shapes of load–displacement profiles before and after the application of temperature cycling. Therefore, comparing the load–displacement profile, peel force, and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">R<sub>c</sub></i> could offer a complete bonding mechanism, failure modes, and failure mechanism for ultrasonic Al bond on MoSe <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> and Mo layers of CIGS TFPV solar panels before and after temperature cycling.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call