Abstract

The emergence of hyperspectral thermal infrared imaging spectrometers makes it possible to retrieve both the land surface temperature (LST) and the land surface emissivity (LSE) simultaneously. However, few articles focus on the problem of how the instrument’s spectral parameters and instrument noise level affect the LST and LSE inversion errors. In terms of instrument development, this article simulated three groups of hyperspectral thermal infrared data with three common spectral parameters and each group of data includes tens of millions of simulated radiances of 1525 emissivity curves with 17 center wavelength shift ratios, 6 full width at half maximum (FWHM) change ratios and 6 noise equivalent differential temperatures (NEDTs) under 15 atmospheric conditions with 6 object temperatures, inverted them by two temperature and emissivity separation methods (ISSTES and ARTEMISS), and analyzed quantitatively the effects of the spectral parameters change and noise of an instrument on the LST and LSE inversion errors. The results show that: (1) center wavelength shifts and noise affect the inversion errors strongly, while FWHM changes affect them weakly; (2) the LST and LSE inversion errors increase with the center wavelength shift ratio in a quadratic function and increase with FWHM change ratio slowly and linearly for both the inversion methods, however they increase with NEDT in an S-curve for ISSTES while they increase with NEDT slightly and linearly for ARTEMISS. During the design and development of a hyperspectral thermal infrared instrument, it is highly recommended to keep the potential center wavelength shift within 1 band and keep NEDT within 0.1K (corresponding LST error < 1K and LSE error < 0.015) for normal applications and within 0.03K (corresponding LST error < 0.5K and LSE error < 0.01) for better application effect and level.

Highlights

  • The land surface temperature (LST) and land surface emissivity (LSE) are key parameters for many areas such as mineral identification [1,2], gas plume detection [3], plant species [4], soil moisture retrieval [5]

  • In [36], the researchers studied the influence of the instrument spectral properties and noise (Gaussian random, 0.1 K, 0.2 K) on the retrieval results for five temperature and emissivity separation (TES) algorithms, and the results shows that even if some spectral response changes cause only a slight change in the observed radiance or the bright temperature spectral data they have a great impact on the LST and LSE retrieval

  • The study displayed the overall distribution trend of inversion errors with the center wavelength shift ratios, full width at half maximum (FWHM) change ratios and instrument noise levels, in order to visualize the comprehensive influence of the three factors on inversion errors from a global perspective

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The land surface temperature (LST) and land surface emissivity (LSE) are key parameters for many areas such as mineral identification [1,2], gas plume detection [3], plant species [4], soil moisture retrieval [5]. In [36], the researchers studied the influence of the instrument spectral properties (the center wavenumber shifts were 4%, 20%, 40%, 60% and FWHM were widen by 5%, 10%, 20%) and noise (Gaussian random, 0.1 K, 0.2 K) on the retrieval results for five TES algorithms, and the results shows that even if some spectral response changes cause only a slight change in the observed radiance or the bright temperature spectral data they have a great impact on the LST and LSE retrieval The above studies both have shown that the changes in spectral response characteristics have a great impact on the TES inversion results, these related studies have paid more attention to exploring the application boundary conditions of the newly proposed TES algorithm or to prove the performance of the new method, the number of samples are small, for example 54 in [36], and the emissivity values of the samples in their experiments are high.

Data and Methods
Ultra-High-Resolution Sensor Entrance Pupil Radiance
Sensor Output Radiance
Temprature and Emissivity Separation Algorithms
ISSTES
ARTEMISS
Evaluation Metrics
The Overall Distribution Trend of Inversion Errors
The Single-Factor Analysis for Inversion Errors
The Relationship between Inversion Errors and Center Wavelength Shift Ratio
The Relationship between Inversion Errors and FWHM Change Ratio
The Relationship between Inversion Errors and NEDT
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call