Abstract

Core Ideas CAN is a widely used form of straight N in Western Europe. Urea+NBPT consistently delivered equal yields and N uptake compared with CAN. CAN had higher N uptake than urea in 2 of 6 site‐years, but yields were not different. NBPT increased the N uptake of urea in 2 of 6 site‐years but had no effect on yield. Urea+DCD had lower yield and N uptake than CAN in 3 and 4 of 6 site‐years, respectively. In temperate grasslands, N source influences greenhouse gas emissions. Nitrification and urea hydrolysis inhibitors can reduce these losses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of N source, urease inhibitors, and nitrification inhibitors on temperate grassland yields and N uptake. Experiments were conducted at three locations over 2 years (6 site‐years) on the island of Ireland, covering a range of soils and climatic conditions. Results showed that calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), urea+N‐(n‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), urea+NBPT+dicyandiamide (DCD), and urea had equal annual dry matter yield. Urea+DCD had lower dry matter yield than CAN for 3 site‐years. Calcium ammonium nitrate and urea+NBPT consistently had the same N uptake, urea+DCD had lower N uptake than CAN in 4 of 6 site‐years, urea had lower N uptake than CAN in 2 site‐years, and urea+NBPT+DCD had lower N uptake than CAN in 1 site‐year. Urea+NBPT is a cost‐effective alternative to CAN, which is consistently equal in terms of yield and N uptake in temperate grassland.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call