Abstract

Microscopy imaging experiments generate vast amounts of data, and there is a high demand for smart acquisition and analysis methods. This is especially true for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) where terabytes of data are produced if imaging a full sample at high resolution, and analysis can take several hours. One way to tackle this issue is to collect a continuous stream of low resolution images whilst moving the sample under the microscope, and thereafter use this data to find the parts of the sample deemed most valuable for high-resolution imaging. However, such image streams are degraded by both motion blur and noise. Building on deep learning based approaches developed for deblurring videos of natural scenes we explore the opportunities and limitations of deblurring and denoising images captured from a fast image stream collected by a TEM microscope. We start from existing neural network architectures and make adjustments of convolution blocks and loss functions to better fit TEM data. We present deblurring results on two real datasets of images of kidney tissue and a calibration grid. Both datasets consist of low quality images from a fast image stream captured by moving the sample under the microscope, and the corresponding high quality images of the same region, captured after stopping the movement at each position to let all motion settle. We also explore the generalizability and overfitting on real and synthetically generated data. The quality of the restored images, evaluated both quantitatively and visually, show that using deep learning for image restoration of TEM live image streams has great potential but also comes with some limitations.

Highlights

  • In recent years there has been an explosion in the amount of image data generated from microscopy experiments due to faster and more automated microscopes

  • In this paper we study the opportunities and limitations of deep learning methods applied to image reconstruction from fast Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image acquisition

  • The networks were evaluated based on the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) [30] and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In recent years there has been an explosion in the amount of image data generated from microscopy experiments due to faster and more automated microscopes. The increased speed at which data is collected results in data-volumes that are costly to handle and exceed the computational and data storage resources available. This entails a need for smarter acquisition and analysis methods. This is especially apparent for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) where the difference between sample size and details of interest is much larger than in other types of microscopy. As a comparison: in histopathology whole slide imaging (WSI) a sample is typically 2 × 1cm and imaged with a pixel size of 0.275μm resulting in approx. As a comparison: in histopathology whole slide imaging (WSI) a sample is typically 2 × 1cm and imaged with a pixel size of 0.275μm resulting in approx. 4 Giga

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call