Abstract

Media outlets often appear to bias news reports, but it is often difficult to document bias cleanly and to ascribe motivation when bias is detected. We test for media bias in a novel setting. We show that in the late 19th century The New York Times weather reports were correlated with the schedule of the Giants, the local professional baseball team: On home game days weather reports were more “optimistic” (i.e., relatively more accurate at predicting sunny weather). The size of optimism is large — when producing in-house forecasts, The New York Times predicted fair weather 14.2 percentage points more often on days when the Giants were scheduled to play at home. We provide a framework for evaluating such bias, and show that the bias is consistent with a demand-driven motivation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.