Abstract

The degree of natal philopatry relative to natal dispersal in animal populations has important demographic and genetic consequences and often varies substantially within species. In salmonid fishes, lakes have been shown to have a strong influence on dispersal and gene flow within catchments; for example, populations spawning in inflow streams are often reproductively isolated and genetically distinct from those spawning in relatively distant outflow streams. Less is known, however, regarding the level of philopatry and genetic differentiation occurring at microgeographic scales, for example, where inflow and outflow streams are separated by very small expanses of lake habitat. Here, we investigated the interplay between genetic differentiation and fine‐scale spawning movements of brown trout between their lake‐feeding habitat and two spawning streams (one inflow, one outflow, separated by <100 m of lake habitat). Most (69.2%) of the lake‐tagged trout subsequently detected during the spawning period were recorded in just one of the two streams, consistent with natal fidelity, while the remainder were detected in both streams, creating an opportunity for these individuals to spawn in both natal and non‐natal streams. The latter behavior was supported by genetic sibship analysis, which revealed several half‐sibling dyads containing one individual that was sampled as a fry in the outflow and another that was sampled as fry in the inflow. Genetic clustering analyses in conjunction with telemetry data suggested that asymmetrical dispersal patterns were occurring, with natal fidelity being more common among individuals originating from the outflow than the inflow stream. This was corroborated by Bayesian analysis of gene flow, which indicated significantly higher rates of gene flow from the inflow into the outflow than vice versa. Collectively, these results reveal how a combination of telemetry and genetics can identify distinct reproductive behaviors and associated asymmetries in natal dispersal that produce subtle, but nonetheless biologically relevant, population structuring at microgeographic scales.

Highlights

  • Natal philopatry, whereby individuals return to their birth place for reproduction, limits gene flow between geographic areas and thereby increases neutral genotypic differentiation among populations via genetic drift

  • Lakes have been shown to have a strong influence on dispersal and gene flow within catchments; for example, populations spawning in inflow streams are often reproductively isolated and genetically distinct from those spawning in relatively distant outflow streams

  • Less is known regarding the level of philopatry and genetic differentiation occurring at microgeographic scales, for example, where inflow and outflow streams are separated by very small expanses of lake habitat

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Whereby individuals return to their birth place for reproduction, limits gene flow between geographic areas and thereby increases neutral genotypic differentiation among populations via genetic drift. Brown trout populations that utilize common lake-feeding habitat but are genetically, behaviorally and morphologically distinct have been found to display reproductive isolation by homing back to separate inflow or outflow rivers for spawning (Ferguson & Mason, 1981; Ferguson & Taggart, 1991; Jacobs et al, 2018). Reproductive isolation appears to promote similar differentiation among sympatric lake-dwelling populations of rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) (Taylors & Bentzent, 1993), Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.) (Jonsson & Jonsson, 2001), Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) (Markevich, Esin, & Anisimova, 2018), and sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus Nerka) (Moreira & Taylor, 2015) It remains unknown, whether consistent, accurate homing behavior and associated genetic divergence occurs between lake-inflow and lake-outflow streams at microgeographic scales of less than 100 m. Our second aim was to use a range of genetic analyses, including clustering approaches, to identify any such half-sibships, test for fine-scale population structure, characterize patterns of gene flow between the streams (symmetric vs. asymmetric), and interpret these patterns in light of the behavioral data and vice versa

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
| Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call