Abstract

The 2008–2010 food crisis might have been a harbinger of fundamental climate-induced food crises with geopolitical implications. Heat-wave-induced yield losses in Russia and resulting export restrictions led to increases in market prices for wheat across the Middle East, likely contributing to the Arab Spring. With ongoing climate change, temperatures and temperature variability will rise, leading to higher uncertainty in yields for major nutritional crops. Here we investigate which countries are most vulnerable to teleconnected supply-shocks, i.e. where diets strongly rely on the import of wheat, maize, or rice, and where a large share of the population is living in poverty. We find that the Middle East is most sensitive to teleconnected supply shocks in wheat, Central America to supply shocks in maize, and Western Africa to supply shocks in rice. Weighing with poverty levels, Sub-Saharan Africa is most affected. Altogether, a simultaneous 10% reduction in exports of wheat, rice, and maize would reduce caloric intake of 55 million people living in poverty by about 5%. Export bans in major producing regions would put up to 200 million people below the poverty line at risk, 90% of which live in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our results suggest that a region-specific combination of national increases in agricultural productivity and diversification of trade partners and diets can effectively decrease future food security risks.

Highlights

  • The future of food security in a changing climate is of global concern

  • The results of this study show that there are many countries with both a high dependency on a single staple crop for supply of calories and a high dependency on imports, often from a very small supplier base

  • Our findings indicate that countries vulnerable to supply shocks of a specific crop are often clustered geographically

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The future of food security in a changing climate is of global concern. Existing analyses of the impacts of climate change on food security focus typically on food production by quantifying to what extent changing temperature and precipitation patterns affect global or country-specific crop yields (Jones and Thornton 2003, Lobell and Field 2007, Nelson et al 2010, Lobell 2011). Average crop yields will decrease as the positive fertilizing effect is more than offset by unfavorable climate conditions. Global warming influences mean total yields; recent work highlights that crop yields become more variable (Asseng et al 2011, Urban 2012, Porter et al 2014) as climatic extremes become more frequent (Rahmstorf and Coumou 2011). Shocks due to adverse weather conditions may become more common

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.