Abstract

AimsWe have analyzed teenagers' self-reported experiences with a fictitious drug, and explored whether observed characteristics of individuals who report use of real illegal substances change when overreporters are excluded from the analyses.Methods & DataData stemmed from a school-based, nationwide survey of 13–19-year-olds in Norway (N = 11928, response rate: 92%).ResultsTwo percent reported that they had been offered the non-existent drug “zetacyllin”, whereas 0,5% allegedly had used it. “Zetacyllin users” appeared to be heavy users of existing substances, and therefore rates of GHB-, heroin-, LSD- and cocaine use dropped markedly when they were excluded from the sample. Correlates of such real drug use also changed when analyses without “zetacyllin users” were performed: The statistical effect of gender (i.e. being male) vanished, whereas the impact of age increased. The pattern of correlates with respect to indicators of socioeconomic background also changed, but in different directions.ConclusionsFalse positives may seriously distort the validity of survey-data on rare phenomena such as hard drug use. Due to this kind of response error rates of uncommon behaviors may be inflated and observed correlates may deviate from the true pattern of correlates.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.