Tectonics of the Jurassic‐Early Cretaceous magmatic arc of the north Chilean Coastal Cordillera (22°–26°S): A story of crustal deformation along a convergent plate boundary

Abstract

The tectonic evolution of a continental magmatic arc that was active in the north Chilean Coastal Cordillera in Jurassic‐Early Cretaceous times is described in order to show the relationship between arc deformation and plate convergence. During stage I (circa 195–155 Ma) a variety of structures formed at deep to shallow crustal levels, indicating sinistral arc‐parallel strike‐slip movements. From deep crustal levels a sequence of structures is described, starting with the formation of a broad belt of plutonic rocks which were sheared under granulite to amphibolite facies conditions (Bolfin Complex). The high‐grade deformation was followed by the formation of two sets of conjugate greenschist facies shear zones showing strike‐slip and thrust kinematics with a NW–SE directed maximum horizontal shortening, i.e., parallel to the probable Late Jurassic vector of plate convergence. A kinematic pattern compatible to this plate convergence is displayed by nonmetamorphic folds, thrusts, and high‐angle normal faults which formed during the same time interval as the discrete shear zones. During stage II (160–150 Ma), strong arc‐normal extension is revealed by brittle low‐angle normal faults at shallow levels and some ductile normal faults and the intrusion of extended plutons at deeper levels. During stage III (155–147 Ma), two reversals in the stress regime took place indicated by two generations of dikes, an older one trending NE–SW and a younger one trending NW–SE. Sinistral strike‐slip movements also prevailed during stage IV (until ∼125 Ma) when the Atacama Fault Zone originated as a sinistral trench‐linked strike‐slip fault. The tectonic evolution of the magmatic arc is interpreted in terms of coupling and decoupling between the downgoing and overriding plates. The structures of stages I and IV suggest that stress transmission due to seismic coupling between the plates was probably responsible for these deformations. However, decoupling of the plates occurred possibly due to a decrease in convergence rate resulting in extension and the reversals of stages II and III.