Abstract
NW-SE trending, transverse lineaments, including the lithospheric-scale Mont-Laurier lineament, are interpreted from regional Bouguer gravity of the Grenville orogen of SW Quebec and adjacent Superior Craton in southeastern Canada. These lineaments, transverse to the ENE trending Grenville orogen, are inferred to correspond to Palaeoproterozoic structures in Archaean basement that have played an important role: (i) in the development of volcano-sedimentary back-arc basins along this segment of the Laurentian margin; (ii) on the geometry of thrust sheets and folds formed during thrusting in the ca. 1.23–1.2Ga Elzevirian orogeny and incorporation of the basins within the orogen; (iii) on reorientation of early-formed structures in the Central Metasedimentary Belt of Quebec (CMB-Q) during ca. 1.19–1.17Ga post-Elzevirian orogenic collapse; and (iv) for development of syn-plutonic deformation corridors and shear zones at the onset of the emplacement of the Morin anorthosite-mangerite-charnockite-granite (AMCG) suite. In the CMB-Q, a 100km wide megakink zone developed during ca. 1.19–1.17Ga differential, post-Elzevirian orogenic collapse in the upper-most nappe above transverse sinistral shear corridors 10–20km wide located in an underlying thrust sheet or “lower-deck”. Emplacement of 1.17Ga Chevreuil intrusive suite preferentially occurred within the megakink zone, starting late in the post-Elzevirian collapse and culminating during a switch to local shortening early in (and in part as a consequence of) the emplacement of the voluminous Morin anorthosite and associated AMCG-suite plutons. The Labelle deformation zone separating the CMB-Q and Morin terrane is interpreted as a post-Shawinigan, reverse shear zone that truncates folded lithological layering in the eastern CMB-Q and western Morin terrane that is either subsequently folded above the Mont-Laurier lineament during its further reactivation, or developed as a curved shear zone stepping across the Mont-Laurier lineament. The Grenville Province of SW Quebec therefore provides an example of strain partitioning and distinct deformation responses at different crustal levels during reactivation of basement structures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.