Technology Application of Normative Evidence for Resolving Administrative Disputes Concerning the Operation of Small Architectural Forms and Temporary Structures

Abstract

under the conditions of decentralization of power in Ukraine, positive changes in the management of cities in the regions of the country, unfortunately, are accompanied by an increase in the number of disputes between citizens (entrepreneurs) and local self-government bodies regarding the operation of small architectural forms and temporary structures. In settling disputes these disputes, there is an ambiguity in the judicial practice of courts of various instances and the legal position of local authorities, that often leads to an imbalance of private and public interests. The general purpose of this article is the formulation of a normatively grounded position, suitable for use in practical activities of local self-government bodies, state bodies, jurists, lawyers and administrative judges on the issues of functioning of small architectural forms and temporary structures that require resolution in the process of municipal and state administration and while the exercising justice. The methodology of the research was based on the use of normative theory of positive law with the use of mainly logical and semantic, comparative and legal methods, as well as the method of legal modeling and sociological survey. The main results of the study are: the definition of inconsistencies of legal acts and regulatory gaps in the mechanism of legal regulation of relations in the sphere of the functioning of small architectural forms and temporary structures; distinguishing normative features of unauthorized objects of urban development; determined the scope and defined the line of competence of local self-government bodies in rule-making and management in the sphere of the functioning of small architectural forms and temporary structures.