Technological challenges of theranostics in oncology

Abstract

Although the term theranostics has been coined only fairly recently, attempts to relate the level of biomarkers to therapeutic response in the oncology clinic go back several decades. After a long period in which a limited number of individual theranostic molecular biomarkers gained general clinical acceptance, extremely powerful genomic and proteomic technologies have now emerged. These technologies, reviewed here, promise a potential revolution in our ability to predict therapeutic response in cancer, and by so doing, guide new anticancer drugs more successfully into clinical oncology practice. A full understanding of the detailed molecular nature of clinical cancer is, however, still evolving. The need for appropriate models of the highly complex disease, against which we are attempting to direct effective therapy more accurately, is also addressed. These should include an understanding of genomic and proteomic heterogeneity, genetic instability and systems biology models of cancer that take into account recent demonstrations of the vastly increased mutational state of the average clinical cancer as compared with the normal cell(s) from which it arose. The way forward in theranostics is, arguably, less dependent on further improvements in the already powerful genomic and proteomic technologies themselves than on our improved understanding of how we should apply them to the complex reality of the average clinical cancer.