Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of new path creation and the survival of the path in technological catching-up. While catching-up literature suggests that a latecomer country may catch-up the advanced ones by creating a new technological path, this paper argues that path-creation must be complemented by Intra-Path Integration and Inter-Path Reconfiguration. In order to confirm this argument, this paper has analysed the cases of Japanese and Korean mobile communications industries. Both countries created new technological paths, but the adoption and the further growth of the Japanese technological path was limited while the Korean path successfully expanded its market performance through the use of Intra-Path Integration and Inter-Path Reconfiguration. These case studies support the argument that Path-Creation alone cannot be a reliable strategy for a latecomer country and must be complemented by two other stages and capabilities, Intra-Path Integration and Inter-Path Reconfiguration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.