Abstract

Researchers have always been concerned about investigating new methods of economic evaluation, in order to endow reliable observations and support the sustainable development of new products. In this sense, clarity and homogeneity are necessary to exploit the effectiveness of such instruments that, only in this way, can provide consistent recommendations among sectors and industries of the economy. With respect to technological innovation, two diffused methods are the techno-economic assessment (TEA) and the life-cycle costing analysis (LCCA). However, despite their diffusion and approval, these instruments still lack clear guidelines and a complete documentation of their distinctive elements. Furthermore, no discussion exists about their complementarity and integrability, despite the fact that these methods are frequently concurrently used in the analyses. With the goal of reviewing what sets one method apart from the other, this research shed some lights on the distinctive elements of TEA and LCCA, as well as providing a preliminary discussion on their (possible) methodical integration. At a first glance, present literature provides numerous cues for an analysis which aim is to improve the comprehension of the norms of application of TEA and LCCA. Though, it is necessary a reorganisation of contents which, at present time, appears heterogenous and uncoordinated. Despite some limitations and its preliminary nature, this research contributes to improve the comprehension of the methods under investigation, also introducing a new vision which sees TEA and LCCA converge in a structured model.

Highlights

  • Minimizing the cost of projects has been a main concern of designers and constructors for many years

  • Despite some limitations and its preliminary nature, this research contributes to improve the comprehension of the methods under investigation, introducing a new vision which sees techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life-cycle costing analysis (LCCA) converge in a structured model

  • This is the case of techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life-cycle costing analysis (LCCA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Minimizing the cost of projects has been a main concern of designers and constructors for many years now. Ever since technological innovation has gained a key role for a sustainable growth of the economy, more accurate and inclusive evaluation tools have been explored to guide research and development towards the market. The intention is to support the advance of more comprehensive assessments, oriented to win-win outcomes – i.e. profit maximization and environmental impacts minimization. This is the case of techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life-cycle costing analysis (LCCA). These two evaluation methods are currently affected by the scarcity of theoretical discussion and a heterogenous practice

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call