Abstract

Solar biomass gasification is an attractive pathway to promote biomass valorization while chemically storing intermittent solar energy into solar fuels. The economic feasibility of a solar gasification process at a large scale for centralized H2 production was assessed, based on the discounted cash-flow rate of return method to calculate the minimum H2 production cost. H2 production costs from solar-only, hybrid and conventional autothermal biomass gasification were evaluated under various economic scenarios. Considering a biomass reference cost of 0.1 €/kg, and a land cost of 12.9 €/m2, H2 minimum price was estimated at 2.99 €/kgH2 and 2.48 €/kgH2 for the allothermal and hybrid processes, respectively, against 2.25 €/kgH2 in the conventional process. A sensitivity study showed that a 50% reduction in the heliostats and solar tower costs, combined with a lower land cost of below 0.5 €/m2, allowed reaching an area of competitiveness where the three processes meet. Furthermore, an increase in the biomass feedstock cost by a factor of 2 to 3 significantly undermined the profitability of the autothermal process, in favor of solar hybrid and solar-only gasification. A comparative study involving other solar and non-solar processes led to conclude on the profitability of fossil-based processes. However, reduced CO2 emissions from the solar process and the application of carbon credits are definitely in favor of solar gasification economics, which could become more competitive. The massive deployment of concentrated solar energy across the world in the coming years can significantly reduce the cost of the solar materials and components (heliostats), and thus further alleviate the financial cost of solar gasification.

Highlights

  • Around 96% of hydrogen is generated from fossil fuels (78% from natural gas and liquid hydrocarbons and 18% from coal) and only a low proportion of 4% is generated from water electrolysis [1]

  • The study was based on the discounted cash-flow rate of return method to calculate the minimum hydrogen production cost

  • The analysis showed that at the current biomass reference cost, the most competitive scenario, assumes a cost reduction of 50% of the heliostats and towers costs, with a land cost of 0.5 €/m2, which is clearly challenging at present and requires an important economic effort

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Around 96% of hydrogen is generated from fossil fuels (78% from natural gas and liquid hydrocarbons and 18% from coal) and only a low proportion of 4% is generated from water electrolysis [1]. The most mature methods for decarbonized H2 production are water electrolysis and steam biomass gasification [5]. According to the IEA Bioenergy’s report in 2018 [5], hydrogen production from biomass, as a complementary route to increase the share of renewables, cannot be accomplished without the full-process chain validation at a large scale, involving an optimal biomass gasification technology capable of treating and converting a wide range of feedstocks. The process goal is to replace feedstock combustion totally (solar-only systems) or partially (hybrid solar/autothermal systems), thanks to external heating using high-temperature concentrating solar technologies. Annual data were generated thanks to the dynamic model to estimate the feedstock consumption and syngas productivity under real solar irradiation conditions. The cost of hydrogen is compared with other solar and non-solar processes for H2 generation

General Principle
Basic Flow Diagram
Capital costs
Fixed Costs
Design Parameters
Key Parameters
Direct
Impact of Feedstock Cost
Impact of Environmental Subsidies
Comparisonnatural with
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call