Technical note: Validation of electronic feeding stations as a swine research tool1

Abstract

Electronic feeding stations (EFS) were developed to automate data collection of individual animals housed in a group environment. In order for scientists to use EFS, such as feed intake recording equipment (FIRE), in research, data recorded electronically cannot differ from data recorded on calibrated scales. The objectives of 2 studies were to determine if data recorded by 2 FIRE stations (FIRE1 and FIRE2) were different from the same data recorded by calibrated scales and determine differences between the 2 independent FIRE stations. Body weight of pigs recorded by the platform scales of both FIRE stations did not differ (P > 0.6) from calibrated scales during a 21-d comparison (study 1). The weight of calibrated check weights recorded by the platform scale of FIRE1 tended to be less (P = 0.1) than the weight of check weights during a 126-d comparison (study 2). Feed disappearance recorded by FIRE1 was greater (P < 0.01) than recorded by calibrated scales during study 2. Feed dispensed to the FIRE trough and compared with calibrated scales did not differ (P ≥ 0.17) for either FIRE station during study 2. There were no differences (P ≥ 0.15) between FIRE1 and FIRE2 for any measured variables. The FIRE stations were not recalibrated during study 1. The platform scale of FIRE2 was recalibrated during study 2 when the percentage error between calibrated check weights and the weight recorded by FIRE exceeded 2.5%. The trough scales of FIRE1 and FIRE2 were recalibrated during study 2 when the percentage error between true weight of dispensed feed and the average recorded FIRE weight exceeded 4%. Establishing more stringent criteria for recalibration may have reduced differences among weights recorded by calibrated scales and weights recorded by FIRE. These data suggest that FIRE stations can be used in research; however, adequate verification procedures and recalibration criteria must be followed to ensure accuracy of data.