Abstract

Abstract. One of four main focus areas of the PEEX initiative is to establish and sustain long-term, continuous, and comprehensive ground-based, airborne, and seaborne observation infrastructure together with satellite data. The Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) aboard ENVISAT is used to observe the Earth in dual view. The AATSR data can be used to retrieve aerosol optical depth (AOD) over both land and ocean, which is an important parameter in the characterization of aerosol properties. In recent years, aerosol retrieval algorithms have been developed both over land and ocean, taking advantage of the features of dual view, which can help eliminate the contribution of Earth's surface to top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance. The Aerosol_cci project, as a part of the Climate Change Initiative (CCI), provides users with three AOD retrieval algorithms for AATSR data, including the Swansea algorithm (SU), the ATSR-2ATSR dual-view aerosol retrieval algorithm (ADV), and the Oxford-RAL Retrieval of Aerosol and Cloud algorithm (ORAC). The validation team of the Aerosol-CCI project has validated AOD (both Level 2 and Level 3 products) and AE (Ångström Exponent) (Level 2 product only) against the AERONET data in a round-robin evaluation using the validation tool of the AeroCOM (Aerosol Comparison between Observations and Models) project. For the purpose of evaluating different performances of these three algorithms in calculating AODs over mainland China, we introduce ground-based data from CARSNET (China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network), which was designed for aerosol observations in China. Because China is vast in territory and has great differences in terms of land surfaces, the combination of the AERONET and CARSNET data can validate the L2 AOD products more comprehensively. The validation results show different performances of these products in 2007, 2008, and 2010. The SU algorithm performs very well over sites with different surface conditions in mainland China from March to October, but it slightly underestimates AOD over barren or sparsely vegetated surfaces in western China, with mean bias error (MBE) ranging from 0.05 to 0.10. The ADV product has the same precision with a low root mean square error (RMSE) smaller than 0.2 over most sites and the same error distribution as the SU product. The main limits of the ADV algorithm are underestimation and applicability; underestimation is particularly obvious over the sites of Datong, Lanzhou, and Urumchi, where the dominant land cover is grassland, with an MBE larger than 0.2, and the main aerosol sources are coal combustion and dust. The ORAC algorithm has the ability to retrieve AOD at different ranges, including high AOD (larger than 1.0); however, the stability deceases significantly with increasing AOD, especially when AOD > 1.0. In addition, the ORAC product is consistent with the CARSNET product in winter (December, January, and February), whereas other validation results lack matches during winter.

Highlights

  • The Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX) is a multidisciplinary, multiscale, and multicomponent research, research infrastructure, and capacity-building program (Kulmala et al, 2015)

  • For the purpose of evaluating different performances of these three algorithms in calculating aerosol optical depth (AOD) over mainland China, we introduce ground-based data from CARSNET (China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network), which was designed for aerosol observations in China

  • Particles from different sources are mixed into aerosol masses to influence aerosol optical depth (AOD), reduce visibility (Kinne et al, 2003; Varotsos 2005; Remer et al, 2005), and cause spatial and temporal variability of AOD; the largest uncertainties in the estimation of radiative forcing are introduced by aerosols (IPCC, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX) is a multidisciplinary, multiscale, and multicomponent research, research infrastructure, and capacity-building program (Kulmala et al, 2015). The basic method for assessment is to compare the retrieval results with data (AOD mainly) obtained by AERONET/CARSNET. AERONET or other ground-based networks provide accurate measurements without the influence of land surface reflection (Holben et al, 1998), which means that comparison of retrieved AOD with ground-based measurements is the basic method. The AATSR L2 products provided by Aerosol_CCI have been validated by the validation team via a round-robin (RR) test (de Leeuw et al, 2013) On this basis, we focused on assessing the performance of AATSR aerosol L2 products in mainland China by comparing the retrieval results with AERONET and CARSNET data

Reference data and validation statistics
Statistical metrics
Validation results and analysis
The ADV algorithm
The ORAC algorithm
The SU algorithm
Uncertainty analysis based on aerosol loading
Uncertainty analysis of individual ground measurement sites
Intercomparison of algorithms site by site
Analysis of algorithm performances in western China
Intercomparison
Seasonal characteristics of three algorithms
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call