Abstract

BackgroundFood waste is a major ecological concern around the globe. While the main function of packaging is to contain and protect food, it may also lead to food waste if residues remain in a package after emptying. Such residues could be attributed to wasteful behavior of consumers, but also to properties of packaging (e.g., geometry, surface tension) and food (e.g., surface tension, viscosity).MethodsIn this study, the technical emptiability (ability of packaging to be emptied entirely) of 36 dairy products is analyzed. Firstly, the amount of food residues in packaging after emptying at room and refrigerator temperature was weighed and set in relation to the original filling quantity. Secondly, streamlined life cycle assessments (LCAs) based on the Product Environmental Footprint guidance with a functional unit of “one kg of consumed dairy product at room or refrigerator temperature in the home of the consumer” are conducted. Finally, technical emptiability was included in the streamlined LCA and attributed to the primary packaging in order to evaluate its environmental impact.ResultsTechnical emptiability for both temperatures combined was found to be between 0.25% (±0.11) and 5.79% (±0.43) for the analyzed dairy products. While there were differences in emptiability results of the same product and different temperatures, no significant trend (p = 0.94) between emptiability and temperature could be observed. Liquid yogurt, cream, and buttermilk in beverage cartons and plastic bottles yielded the highest amounts, while milk in beverage cartons and glass bottles yielded the lowest amounts regarding food residues. Looking at global warming potential, poor technical emptiability of cream in a beverage carton leads to even higher environmental impacts than the production and waste management of its packaging.DiscussionThe streamlined LCA results show that food residues can contribute substantially to the footprint of packaging and can have similar or even higher environmental impacts than packaging production and waste management. Yet, emptiability is remarkably under-researched to this day. Future studies should further develop the methods presented in this paper, while LCA analysts should include technical emptiability when assessing the sustainability of packaging, particularly for those containing resource-intensive goods.

Highlights

  • Worldwide, 1.3 billion metric tons or approximately one-third of the food produced is lost or wasted every year (Gustavsson, Cederberg & Sonesson, 2011)

  • The present results show that in the food-packaging system of dairy products in Austria, the food contents always account for the highest percentage in life cycle assessments (LCAs) results

  • Surprising is that for some products, food residues are responsible for even higher environmental impacts than their primary packaging

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.3 billion metric tons or approximately one-third of the food produced is lost or wasted every year (Gustavsson, Cederberg & Sonesson, 2011). In low and middle-income countries, missing or inappropriate packaging is stated as one of the major contributors to FLW (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2014). While the main function of packaging is to contain and protect food, it may lead to food waste if residues remain in a package after emptying. Methods: In this study, the technical emptiability (ability of packaging to be emptied entirely) of 36 dairy products is analyzed. Looking at global warming potential, poor technical emptiability of cream in a beverage carton leads to even higher environmental impacts than the production and waste management of its packaging. Discussion: The streamlined LCA results show that food residues can contribute substantially to the footprint of packaging and can have similar or even higher environmental impacts than packaging production and waste management. Future studies should further develop the methods presented in this paper, while LCA analysts should include technical emptiability when assessing the sustainability of packaging, for those containing resource-intensive goods

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call