Abstract

The implementation of Team-Based Learning (TBL, http://www.teambasedlearning.org) in one-semester undergraduate courses of chemistry offered to first year students is reported. TBL is an active learning instructional strategy heavily relying on small group interaction. Teaching lab classes in a TBL context presented a specific challenge, as decisions were required about their role in the global framework and the possibility of incorporating lab activities as “teamwork”. The design of lab sessions as TBL team application activities is here also illustrated, both for a course of General Chemistry and a course of Organic Chemistry. TBL dramatically improved students class attendance and participation. Its implementation has provided a unique opportunity for the pedagogical development of teaching staff. A moderate number of students reported discomfort with TBL: the requirement of individual preparation before classes and the impact of team participation in the final grade is indeed a new ground for most students, often perceived as a troubling deviation from the common social paradigm of the learning process. The role of the instructor as a facilitator of individual and team work, and the clear explanation of the method are thus of utmost relevance.

Highlights

  • Pedagogical innovation is becoming a key aspect in assessing the quality of Universities (Abbott et al, 2014) due to new requirements of labour markets, new sources of information for intellectual production and new possibilities for social participation

  • Evidence is available that active learning can yield better educational results than the traditional method based on lectures (Freeman et al, 2014; Waldrop, 2015)

  • Team Based Learning (TBL, http://www.teambasedlearning.org) is an active learning instructional strategy heavily relying on small group interaction (Michaelsen et al, 2002; Michaelsen & Sweet, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pedagogical innovation is becoming a key aspect in assessing the quality of Universities (Abbott et al, 2014) due to new requirements of labour markets, new sources of information for intellectual production and new possibilities for social participation. Insights about the neural processes of learning demand new strategies of teaching. Pedagogical innovation cannot aim at incremental improvements of traditional procedures with no questioning of the paradigms of teaching and learning. Evidence is available that active learning can yield better educational results than the traditional method based on lectures (Freeman et al, 2014; Waldrop, 2015). Organizational changes are demanded to improve science education with evidence-based teaching practices (Bradforth et al, 2015). Most of class time is used for team activities consisting in the application content to solve problems. A TBL course is organized in cycles (corresponding to content units) each one consisting in the Readiness Assurance Process (RAP) and Application Activities. In this article we communicate our experience in the implementation of undergraduate chemistry courses using the TBL methodology

Implementation details
Findings
Assessment

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.