Teaching Spatial Planning Using Elements of Design Thinking as an Example of Heuristic in Urban Planning

Rafał Blazy,Mariusz Łysień

doi:10.3390/su13084225

Abstract

In modern urban analysis, line–nodal connections are often used as a model, diagram or matrix for describing space and its accompanying phenomena. In practice, the search for relationships in space is often nothing but the designation of lines reflecting their physical and nonphysical association by their geometry. Recording the spatial issues of a city constituting a very complex structure on the surface of paper, or on a computer monitor, is an extremely difficult conceptual task. At the heart of Design Thinking is a deep understanding of the relationship between different elements. It can therefore be concluded that heuristics are the basis for understanding the Design Thinking method. An attempt was made to check whether the Design Thinking method can restore the optimal balance between modern tools used to develop course projects, and the need to search for the best solution constituting the idea of the project. The article presents the results of two-year research on the use of the Design Thinking method in academic teaching of subjects related to the subject of spatial planning. Thanks to the use of the Design Thinking method in teaching spatial planning, it is often possible to discover design possibilities and proposals that surprise students.

Highlights

Heuristics is the ability to detect new facts and relationships between them, often using previously to made hypotheses
Many of them still face the challenges posed by the remains of industrial buildings which are currently located in city centers and which often define the attractiveness of a given urban center
Remains of industrial buildings which are currently located in city centers and which often define the attractiveness of a given urban center

Summary

Introduction

Heuristics (from Greek word εὑρίσκω—heuriskō—which means “find”) is the ability to detect new facts and relationships between them, often using previously to made hypotheses In spatial planning, this is usually done by graphical analysis, which is an instrument for mapping and codifying three-dimensional reality. Attempts to graphically reproduce them are most often made by symbolic connection of individual elements of the spatial and functional structure by and with the lines and axis. This method is looking for spatial relations, and, at the same time, it illustrates the way of thinking about the problem by its authors, reminiscent of the method called “mind-mapping”

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion