Abstract
This article is an attempt to assess what a stimulating and serious course on terrorism should and should not be. The article is divided into three sections. The first examines the profusion of academic literature on terrorism, particularly with regard to providing students with the tools to separate the wheat from the chaff. At the heart of this section is a call to return to the literature on political violence and collective action in order to more effectively ascertain the intellectual, social, environmental, and cognitive mechanisms that lead people to rebel and act violently. The second section explores how nonacademic literature or nontraditional teaching materials can usefully supplement the literature mentioned above and, particularly, in preparing students to engage with primary sources. The final section outlines how and why role-playing can be used. The authors conclude that teaching terrorism should be a matter of cross-disciplinary fertilization in order to reduce the uncertainty created by the word terrorism, which overshadows current practice and precludes proper attention being paid to the social, political, and psychological mechanisms of political violence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.