Abstract
Argues that people have very different views on what constitutes “quality” in higher education, but that current debate in universities about the declining unit of resource, the increased numbers of students, the structure of qualifications and academic audit and assessment, makes radical rethinking about policy for high quality teaching, learning and assessment a professional imperative for decision makers at all levels of provision. Suggests that the Warnock Report (1990) has valuable contributions to make for policy and practice, and sketches what they might be; but argues that the perception of “reality gap” between policy formulation and implementation is down to a lack of clear communication with those who matter most: the teachers and learners.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
