Abstract

The statement of teaching philosophy reflects on teachers’ growth and dedication to achieve the goal and values. Concerning philosophy, physics is the most fundamental science discipline which has profound philosophical implications. This article aims to discuss the importance of the teaching philosophy statement (TPS) for sustaining the teaching-learning process in the classroom. Moreover, it also includes the authors’ TPS in teaching physics. This academic paper employs the systematic literature review and narrative literature review to explain scholarly opinion regarding teaching philosophy among physics and natural sciences philosophers. Three educational implications have been discussed. First, educators need to realize that not every student wants to be a physicist, and teachers need to manage this problem. More often, the physics teachers also have to think about addressing students with different abilities in the classroom. Second, as the facilitator of the learning outcomes, the teachers must possess good character and value-laden attributes necessary for teaching. Finally, the researchers of this study provide the TPS for physics, “Let Us Think About,” and philosophical implications in teaching physics. The term of teaching philosophy may vary based on the expert who writes it and its application in the classroom (i.e., philosophy in science teaching, philosophy of physics, philosophy of science in teaching, teaching philosophy, teaching statement, and teaching philosophy statement). However, the teaching philosophy statement is the most common phrase since Beatty et al. explain the concept in the early 21st century. In addition, the finding indicates that TPS is important for developing teachers’ way of thinking in the classroom setting.

Highlights

  • In many schools and universities, a philosophy of teaching statement is considered part of the dossier for promotion and tenure and the faculty candidate application package ( Eierman, 2008; Drolet, 2013)

  • From 28 reviewed articles, authors find some articles using the term in philosophy of science teaching (2 studies) (Matthews, 1988; Pospiech, 2003), philosophy of physics (6 studies) (Seeger, 1960; Crowe, 1999; Noll, 2002; Scott, 2015; Rajapaksha & Hirsch, 2017; Bächtold & Munier, 2019), philosophy of science in teaching (5 studies) (Terhart, 1988; Matthews, 1990; Elkana, 2000; Teixeira et al, 2012; Henke & Höttecke, 2015), teaching philosophy (2 studies) (Kurki-Suonio, 2011; Bartholomew et al, 2012), teaching statement (1 study) (Oxley, 2015), and teaching philosophy statement (12 studies) ( Beatty et al, 2009a, 2020a, 2020b; Grundman, 2006; Eierman, 2008; Kearns & Sullivan, 2011; Alexander et al, 2012; Drolet, 2013; Supasiraprapa & De Costa, 2017; Laundon et al, 2020; Merkel, 2020; Trellinger Buswell & Berdanier, 2020)

  • The most common words mentioned by the researchers on this issue are the teaching philosophy statement (TPS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In many schools and universities, a philosophy of teaching statement is considered part of the dossier for promotion and tenure and the faculty candidate application package ( Eierman, 2008; Drolet, 2013). This necessity of teaching philosophy can stimulate reflection on teaching, assist teachers in evaluating their growth, and reaffirm their commitment to the goals and values (Chism, 1998). Teachers’ requirement that is emphasized to students (e.g., too much examination) guide philosophical implications in physics may be lost

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call