Abstract

Teaching introductory modules and classes of undergraduate programmes can present a number of subjective and objective challenges. Objective challenges include a high degree of variation in students’ prior learning experiences combined with a high student-teacher ratio. Subjective challenges include the transitional changes which first year students undergo that include cognitive, affective and physiological changes as they make the leap from the often small and secluded secondary-level environment to the all-consuming tertiary-level environment. For introductory chemistry modules, such as General Chemistry, the pertinence of these challenges can have negative repercussions on students’ acquirement of basic chemical concepts in first year which could inherently go on to hinder their successful progression through their third-level education. In an effort to tackle the challenges posed against effective learning in General Chemistry modules, this exploratory research study set out to understand how the potential incorporation of a new approach to teaching and learning would be received by the three main cohorts involved. The attitudes and recommendations of undergraduate students, post-graduate students who have a role as laboratory demonstrators and module leaders towards the potential incorporation of Student-Inquiry activities and laboratories into General Chemistry were investigated. All three cohorts welcomed the incorporation of Student-Inquiry as part of the approach to teaching and learning. While the researchers and module leaders had an initial awareness of the challenges that come with teaching General Chemistry, little was known of the potential significance of the opportunity which lay amongst these challenges.

Highlights

  • Teaching introductory modules and classes of undergraduate programmes can present a number of subjective and objective challenges

  • In response to the demand for a highly educated and skilled workforce which this report calls for, there has since been an increase of 14% in the number of full-time undergraduate students enrolled in third level institutes across Ireland (Higher Education Authority, 2014)

  • Third level institutions and first year, General Chemistry policy makers should identify the importance of prioritising the need to foster and cater for the learning needs of this diverse student landscape by employing an appropriate teaching and learning approach

Read more

Summary

I would find Student-Inquiry laboratories challenging

Students expressed concern in participating in SI activities with others who would have completed chemistry before during second-level education or who would have already had acquired a greater and more robust understanding of chemistry during the semester. LDs were in strongest agreement with the statement “The implementation of Student-Inquiry activities in science laboratories would be effective for promoting positive learning experiences for students” (mean rating = 1.5, Table 2). LDs expressed confidence and belief in the current approach to teaching and learning in chemistry laboratories This was shown through their strongest disagreement with the statement “There is a need for the current teaching strategy that is used in today’s chemistry laboratories to be reviewed and changed” (2.941). Demonstrators’ agreed that their role in the laboratory should be based on their active engagement with each group of students by asking them questions (1.765) and asking them to make predictions about the experimental outcome (1.765)

A laboratory demonstrator should actively engage with each
Findings
11 Laboratory demonstrators are provided with opportunities to
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call